Can machines be conscious?

Image
    The Great Revolt

Moderators: ᴶᵛᵀᴬ, Omphalos, Freakzilla

User avatar
Orthodox
Posts: 61
Joined: 29 Mar 2010 09:35

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby Orthodox » 07 Apr 2010 16:49

It just keeps getting weirder and weirder. I wonder what people will think of an automated Stealth bomber. Did no one learn from the movie Stealth?
Image
Any road followed precisely to its end leads precisely nowhere. Climb the mountain just a little bit to test it's a mountain. From the top of the mountain, you cannot see the mountain. -- Frank Herbert

User avatar
SadisticCynic
Posts: 2029
Joined: 07 Apr 2009 09:28
Location: In Time or in Space?

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby SadisticCynic » 07 Apr 2010 18:02

Orthodox wrote:It just keeps getting weirder and weirder. I wonder what people will think of an automated Stealth bomber. Did no one learn from the movie Stealth?


The fact that we are having this discussion seems to indicate nobody learned from the myriad movies about AI... :)
Ah English, the language where pretty much any word can have any meaning! - A Thing of Eternity

User avatar
Freakzilla
Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
Posts: 18163
Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Contact:

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby Freakzilla » 07 Apr 2010 18:41

SadisticCynic wrote:
Orthodox wrote:It just keeps getting weirder and weirder. I wonder what people will think of an automated Stealth bomber. Did no one learn from the movie Stealth?


The fact that we are having this discussion seems to indicate nobody learned from the myriad movies about AI... :)


I only watched that movie for Jessica Biel (the only woman to ever look hot in a G-suit):

Image
Image
Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
~Pink Snowman

User avatar
Nekhrun
Icelandic Wiener
Posts: 3289
Joined: 10 Feb 2008 16:27

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby Nekhrun » 07 Apr 2010 18:43

Kurzweil debates machine consciousness: http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.ht ... ?m=4%23688
"If he was here to discuss Dune, he sure as hell picked a dumb way to do it." -Omphalos :character-cookiemonster:

Happy Memorial Day everyone! -James C. Harwood

"Three of my videos have over 100 views."
"Over 500 views for my 'Open Question' video." -Nebiros

User avatar
A Thing of Eternity
Posts: 6090
Joined: 08 Apr 2008 15:35
Location: Calgary Alberta

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby A Thing of Eternity » 07 Apr 2010 18:46

Kurz'y a wack-job, but I'll be interested to read that when I get some free time later.
Image

User avatar
SandChigger
KJASF Ground Zero
Posts: 14490
Joined: 08 Feb 2008 22:29
Location: "Whatcha having, shoog? Hurry up and order now, I ain't got all day!"
Contact:

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby SandChigger » 07 Apr 2010 23:29

A Thing of Eternity wrote:Kurz'y a wack-job

He is indeed. :P

Imagine how he's going to feel if someone demonstrates that it's impossible to upload human consciousness into another medium. :?

"GODDAMMIT TO HELL! I WASTED ALL THAT TIME ON MEDICAL TESTS AND EXTREME REGIMENS AND EXERCISING AND EATING MY BODY WEIGHT IN SUPPLEMENTS & PILLS EVERY DAY?! AND ALL FOR NOTHING?!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!!"

:lol:

User avatar
TheDukester
Posts: 3808
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 13:44
Location: Operation Enduring Bacon
Contact:

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby TheDukester » 07 Apr 2010 23:44

Freakzilla wrote:I only watched that movie for Jessica Biel (the only woman to ever look hot in a G-suit)

Jesus Christ!

Hello, Netflix? Send that movie, please!
"Anything I write will be remembered and listed in bibliographies on Dune for several hundred years ..." — some delusional halfwit troll.

User avatar
A Thing of Eternity
Posts: 6090
Joined: 08 Apr 2008 15:35
Location: Calgary Alberta

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby A Thing of Eternity » 08 Apr 2010 12:08

SandChigger wrote:
A Thing of Eternity wrote:Kurz'y a wack-job

He is indeed. :P

Imagine how he's going to feel if someone demonstrates that it's impossible to upload human consciousness into another medium. :?

:lol:


Bah, that's the tip of the iceberg of wackyness with him. I don't think he's nutso for thinking we'll be able to upload consciousness into a digital medium and become immortal - I have my doubts, but it's not really that far-fetched.

What's wacko (and also very sad) is that he thinks he's be able to digitally resurrect his dead father with information from his memories of the man, and letters he wrote. So very sad, and so very insane. Anyone could see that this is only going to lead to a very poor simulation of the man.
Image

User avatar
SandChigger
KJASF Ground Zero
Posts: 14490
Joined: 08 Feb 2008 22:29
Location: "Whatcha having, shoog? Hurry up and order now, I ain't got all day!"
Contact:

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby SandChigger » 08 Apr 2010 14:18

Eeew. I hadn't heard any of that about his father.

That's a wee bit dim of him, isn't it? :roll:

User avatar
Omphalos
Inglorious Bastard
Posts: 6630
Joined: 05 Feb 2008 11:07
Location: The Mighty Central Valley of California
Contact:

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby Omphalos » 08 Apr 2010 15:13

SandChigger wrote:Eeew. I hadn't heard any of that about his father.

That's a wee bit dim of him, isn't it? :roll:


Unless his theory is that the best you can do is a simulation anyway, and that nobody will be able to tell the difference. Agree that probably is not enough, but...

User avatar
SandChigger
KJASF Ground Zero
Posts: 14490
Joined: 08 Feb 2008 22:29
Location: "Whatcha having, shoog? Hurry up and order now, I ain't got all day!"
Contact:

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby SandChigger » 08 Apr 2010 21:45

Doesn't Reynolds have three levels of sim ... "realism", or fidelity-to-original, in his Revelation Space-verse? Ranging from gamma to alpha, with gamma the lowest and representing a sort of souped-up expert system/AI, beta a more recognizable simulation of a human persona, and alpha being virtually indistinguishable from the original human personality? (SPOILER!! The one character shares his body with an alpha sim of his father at one point?) Something like that? (Sorry, it's been a good three or four years since I read Revelation Space!)

In those terms, I don't see how you could ever get anything better than a beta sim without scanning or interaction with the original. Which of course is impossible in the case of the deceased.

User avatar
Aquila ka-Hecate
Posts: 233
Joined: 21 Feb 2010 06:52
Location: Johannesburg
Contact:

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby Aquila ka-Hecate » 08 Apr 2010 22:01

Urgh. Ray Kurzweil's always struck me as a tad unhinged, but this kind of proves it to me.

That said, I tend to think that one's ancestors reside in one's cells.

Hell - I'm in Africa, where the Ancestors walk with us every step of the way. That's my attempt at making sense of it.

User avatar
Freakzilla
Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
Posts: 18163
Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Contact:

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby Freakzilla » 08 Apr 2010 22:21

SandChigger wrote:Doesn't Reynolds have three levels of sim ... "realism", or fidelity-to-original, in his Revelation Space-verse? Ranging from gamma to alpha, with gamma the lowest and representing a sort of souped-up expert system/AI, beta a more recognizable simulation of a human persona, and alpha being virtually indistinguishable from the original human personality? (SPOILER!! The one character shares his body with an alpha sim of his father at one point?) Something like that? (Sorry, it's been a good three or four years since I read Revelation Space!)

In those terms, I don't see how you could ever get anything better than a beta sim without scanning or interaction with the original. Which of course is impossible in the case of the deceased.


I just read it.

Alpha was the uploaded consciousness and Beta was sort of a copy of that, or a simulation of the Alpha. I think...
Image
Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
~Pink Snowman

User avatar
SandChigger
KJASF Ground Zero
Posts: 14490
Joined: 08 Feb 2008 22:29
Location: "Whatcha having, shoog? Hurry up and order now, I ain't got all day!"
Contact:

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby SandChigger » 08 Apr 2010 22:56

Thanks! Was kinda in the ballpark. ;)

I thought I remembered some mention of gamma sims, too. Kinda like automated reception desks or information centers, places and things where a slight human touch was felt desirable.

Could also just be a brainfart. I'm gassy this morning something awful. :lol:

User avatar
Freakzilla
Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
Posts: 18163
Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Contact:

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby Freakzilla » 08 Apr 2010 23:23

SandChigger wrote:Thanks! Was kinda in the ballpark. ;)

I thought I remembered some mention of gamma sims, too. Kinda like automated reception desks or information centers, places and things where a slight human touch was felt desirable.

Could also just be a brainfart. I'm gassy this morning something awful. :lol:


Oh yeah... I think Beta was the copy of the Alpha (which couldn't be genuinely copied in theory) and the Gamma was the simulation.

That book was way out there, man. :crazy:
Image
Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
~Pink Snowman

User avatar
A Thing of Eternity
Posts: 6090
Joined: 08 Apr 2008 15:35
Location: Calgary Alberta

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby A Thing of Eternity » 09 Apr 2010 10:50

Freakzilla wrote:
SandChigger wrote:Thanks! Was kinda in the ballpark. ;)

I thought I remembered some mention of gamma sims, too. Kinda like automated reception desks or information centers, places and things where a slight human touch was felt desirable.

Could also just be a brainfart. I'm gassy this morning something awful. :lol:


Oh yeah... I think Beta was the copy of the Alpha (which couldn't be genuinely copied in theory) and the Gamma was the simulation.

That book was way out there, man. :crazy:


That book is nothing, the first book I read by him was Absolution Gap, which to this day remains one of the most bizzare dark messed up books I've ever read...
Image

User avatar
SadisticCynic
Posts: 2029
Joined: 07 Apr 2009 09:28
Location: In Time or in Space?

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby SadisticCynic » 01 Jun 2010 20:19

In case anyone's interested, Penrose on consciousness:

Ah English, the language where pretty much any word can have any meaning! - A Thing of Eternity

User avatar
Smiley
Posts: 49
Joined: 13 Nov 2014 21:16

Re: Can machines be conscious?

Postby Smiley » 12 Dec 2014 13:09

SandRider wrote:tl;dr: most of this thread

what that (as yet) unknown intelligent "spark" is in the human brain, whether "spiritual" or bio-chemical is a different question -

No-one has yet explained to me how a man-made machine can "exceed its programming" ...

I will concede that a machine could be built that would simulate independent "consciousness",
and materials and robotics could advance to the point that a "replicant" would be indistinguishable
from an actual human (except to Rick Deckard, but he was replicant, too), and I will concede they
could be programmed to build more machines like themselves, independently, (thus "procreating")
and so may in some stretch be considered a new "lifeform" in a way, or "sentient being" (or self-aware or what-have-you)
but
they will still be machines; how can a program innovate independently ? (outside of a comic book ?)

Can machines be conscious ? no, not the SiFi sense ....

as Frank Herbert has said many times in the text of his novels, knowing is the greatest barrier to learning. The programming could be very basic. Like our programming drives us to be social, eat and have sex.
We also have an inhibition mechanism that stops us in certain cases. This allows us to rise above basic needs and exceed said programming.
Yes I am describing evolutionary drives as a program. If this doesn't hold let me know . My only other point is that just because it cannot be done now doesn't mean it can't be done. Machines in the future and their software might be beyond our current understanding of such things.


Return to “˲”