• Register
  • Login
  •          

    Desertification Discrepancy

    Image
      Post your own creative writing

    Moderators: Omphalos, Freakzilla, ᴶᵛᵀᴬ

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby Feydakin » 18 May 2010 22:52

    This is another frame of reference that I haven't seen mentioned (yet):

    The worms before Leto were witless beasts. After Leto, they contained a "pearl of awareness"...prescient ability inclusive. Could it not be possible that the worms themselves had not only oracular power, but the capacity to react to their visions? And that, upon need pressing, they could react to the need of humanity (particularly a joint effort between them and the weather control of the Bene Gesserit) by adapting and overtaking a planet more quickly than normal?

    That's how I read the books. I also got the impression the Spice they produced was consistent with their vision, i.e., it affected the users and thus gave his Golden Path scope even after his death.

    It has been over 2 years since my last full readings, though. So I could just be babbling.
    No rain, no rainbows.
    "spannungsbogen" -- a self-imposed delay between the desire of a thing, and the act of reaching out to grasp that thing.
    User avatar
    Feydakin
     
    Posts: 4
    Joined: 17 May 2010 21:36

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby SandChigger » 18 May 2010 23:26

    But ... sandworms don't produce the spice. (Not the spice that humans harvest and consume, at any rate.)

    The spice is blow-blenderized, sun-and-wind-dried, fermented sandtrout shit and piss. The only way for the composition of the spice to have been altered would be for the composition of the sandtrout excretions to be different. (I don't remember Leto saying anything about a change in the spice itself, though. Quote?)

    The Golden Path didn't need any help or maintenance after The Scattering took place; it was de facto in effect as long as any humans remained alive anywhere in the universe (multiverse?).

    I personally think the whole "pearls of awareness locking humanity into Leto's vision" is a Bene Gesserit misunderstanding, born of their continuing fear of the Tyrant they had helped create.

    (By the way, worms with oracular power ... that's another McDune Heresy introduced in Sandworms: the sandworms of Rakis "see" the Honored Matre attack coming and burrow down deep into the planet, where they "hibernate" and wait for conditions to improve on the surface. :roll: )
    User avatar
    SandChigger
    KJASF Ground Zero
     
    Posts: 14490
    Joined: 08 Feb 2008 22:29
    Location: "Whatcha having, shoog? Hurry up and order now, I ain't got all day!"

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby Feydakin » 18 May 2010 23:58

    I don't believe I've read more than three of the prequels. I quit reading them at about the third.

    My thought of oracular worms comes from the pearls of consciousness part and as far as I know was my own thought before the prequel (sequel? the literary equivalent of feces?) you mention was ever written.

    If your view is based on the pearls of consciousness being a misunderstanding; it will necessarily clash with any view that sees the pearls of consciousness as literal truth. I imagine that's the fundamental difference between the viewpoint I expressed and yours.

    Why do you think it was a misunderstanding?
    No rain, no rainbows.
    "spannungsbogen" -- a self-imposed delay between the desire of a thing, and the act of reaching out to grasp that thing.
    User avatar
    Feydakin
     
    Posts: 4
    Joined: 17 May 2010 21:36

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby SandChigger » 19 May 2010 00:29

    No, I said that I think the view that the pearls of awareness (the books never say "consciousness", by the way) CONTROL human destiny is a BG delusion.

    Basically, I think the idea that the simple act of viewing the future through prescience in some way creates that future is nonsense. Either way, the new worms may carry a "pearl of awareness", but they are by no means conscious. How then can they act to alter events and control all of humanity throughout the universe?

    One of the points of The Scattering, by Leto's design, was to prevent humanity from ever again falling under the control of a single prescient being like himself. It makes no sense at all if even after The Scattering he is still controlling them through the new worms, now does it?
    User avatar
    SandChigger
    KJASF Ground Zero
     
    Posts: 14490
    Joined: 08 Feb 2008 22:29
    Location: "Whatcha having, shoog? Hurry up and order now, I ain't got all day!"

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby Hunchback Jack » 19 May 2010 01:02

    Just a minor thought, but Leto said it would take 300 years for worms to "reign" - i.e. become the dominant life form. Presumably they appeared much sooner than that.

    HBJ
    "The sky calls to us. If we do not destroy ourselves, we will one day venture to the stars."
    - Carl Sagan

    I'm still very proud of The Quarry but … let's face it; in the end the real best way to sign off would have been with a great big rollicking Culture novel.
    - Iain Banks
    User avatar
    Hunchback Jack
     
    Posts: 1982
    Joined: 30 May 2008 15:02
    Location: California, USA

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby A Little Galach » 21 May 2010 09:46

    SandChigger wrote:McDUNE HERESY!!! :angry-screaming:

    (Sandworms DO NOT produce the spice. :twisted: )


    Shut it, old man. The worms are a necessary part of the cycle that produces spice. No worms, no spice. Correct?
    A Little Galach
     
    Posts: 172
    Joined: 26 Mar 2010 16:37

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby SandChigger » 21 May 2010 11:15

    Actually, no, if you really think about it.

    The sandtrout propagate on their own. (Otherwise the introduction of only a few would never be enough to change a planet, or those that were freed when Leto died would never have been able to redesertify Arrakis, or achieve the transformation on Chapterhouse.) If someone could be on hand at every spice-blow and destroy any cysts formed by surviving sandtrout, there would never be any worms. But there would be spice. ;)
    User avatar
    SandChigger
    KJASF Ground Zero
     
    Posts: 14490
    Joined: 08 Feb 2008 22:29
    Location: "Whatcha having, shoog? Hurry up and order now, I ain't got all day!"

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby SandRider » 24 May 2010 00:14

    consider yerself schooled ....

    :cylon101:
    ................ I exist only to amuse myself ................
    ImageImage

    I personally feel that this message board, Jacurutu, is full of hateful folks who don't know
    how to fully interact with people.
    ~ "Spice Grandson" (Bryon Merrit) 08 June 2008
    User avatar
    SandRider
    Watermaster
     
    Posts: 6163
    Joined: 05 Oct 2008 16:14
    Location: In the back of your mind. Always.

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby tenfingersofdoom » 08 Nov 2011 23:02

    skipping the heresy, there was a bit in chapterhouse about weather control for optimization of the environment for worms. i dont have PDF's to quote from either, sorry.
    Kevin J. Anderson is so stupid he thinks he invented The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen since he wrote the movie tie-in.
    tenfingersofdoom
     
    Posts: 65
    Joined: 03 Jun 2010 22:08

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby Freakzilla » 29 Mar 2012 23:31

    Huh??
    Image
    Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
    ~Pink Snowman
    User avatar
    Freakzilla
    Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
     
    Posts: 18057
    Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
    Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby lotek » 30 Mar 2012 07:07

    A Little Galach wrote:My impression was that the worms had been back on Rakis for a while (Hundreds of years) because the "art" of the dancing by the peasants and the "translating" of people by the priests was pretty ingrained in the culture, and the skill of the pioneers in avoiding the worms by Sheeana's village was pretty adept. I would also imagine that for the priesthood to have any real sway on Rakis they would need to actually have sandworms to showcase a tangible Divided God and sandworms producing spice in order to accumulate wealth.


    the worms came back because the desert grew, no desert no worms.

    What peasants dancing ?
    The dance was done by street artists.
    What does "translating of people" mean ?

    The pioneers in Sheeana's village were all wiped out in a single worm attack, I wouldn't call that skilled.

    The priesthood already had power on Rakis, remember how Sheeana not being scared of them is a rare occurrence (people disappeared when they displeased the priests)

    And I don't see why they would "need a worm to showcase the divided god" when there were already worms on Rakis, even if less than before they were still there and proof enough for the faithful.

    Finally, sandworms don't produce spice as you were explained.
    Spice is the worm's gonads.
    User avatar
    lotek
     
    Posts: 5734
    Joined: 28 Jul 2009 08:33

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby SadisticCynic » 30 Mar 2012 08:07

    lotek wrote:
    A Little Galach wrote:My impression was that the worms had been back on Rakis for a while (Hundreds of years) because the "art" of the dancing by the peasants and the "translating" of people by the priests was pretty ingrained in the culture, and the skill of the pioneers in avoiding the worms by Sheeana's village was pretty adept. I would also imagine that for the priesthood to have any real sway on Rakis they would need to actually have sandworms to showcase a tangible Divided God and sandworms producing spice in order to accumulate wealth.


    the worms came back because the desert grew, no desert no worms.

    What peasants dancing ?
    The dance was done by street artists.
    What does "translating of people" mean ?

    The pioneers in Sheeana's village were all wiped out in a single worm attack, I wouldn't call that skilled.

    The priesthood already had power on Rakis, remember how Sheeana not being scared of them is a rare occurrence (people disappeared when they displeased the priests)

    And I don't see why they would "need a worm to showcase the divided god" when there were already worms on Rakis, even if less than before they were still there and proof enough for the faithful.

    Finally, sandworms don't produce spice as you were explained.


    Just one thing, the 'translating of people' was the priests way of disposing of people they didn't like i.e. they fed them to the worms.
    Ah English, the language where pretty much any word can have any meaning! - A Thing of Eternity
    User avatar
    SadisticCynic
     
    Posts: 2002
    Joined: 07 Apr 2009 09:28
    Location: In Time or in Space?

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby lotek » 30 Mar 2012 08:10

    SadisticCynic wrote:Just one thing, the 'translating of people' was the priests way of disposing of people they didn't like i.e. they fed them to the worms.


    Thanks, I forgot that !
    (obviously)

    But wait a second, wouldn't that count as showcasing worms ?

    ^^
    Spice is the worm's gonads.
    User avatar
    lotek
     
    Posts: 5734
    Joined: 28 Jul 2009 08:33

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby NotOnasander » 11 Apr 2012 22:23

    Sandchigger, by your logic then, the aquaworms are impotent and will never produce spice. Clearly your wrong, KJA wouldnt of overlooked something that critical.

    Spice Eels.
    NotOnasander
     

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby Freakzilla » 13 Apr 2012 10:16

    NotOnasander wrote:Sandchigger, by your logic then, the aquaworms are impotent and will never produce spice. Clearly your wrong, KJA wouldnt of overlooked something that critical.

    Spice Eels.


    To the contray, Keith looks for things he can change to put his mark on it, like a dog pissing on a tree.
    Image
    Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
    ~Pink Snowman
    User avatar
    Freakzilla
    Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
     
    Posts: 18057
    Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
    Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby lotek » 13 Apr 2012 10:59

    Why are we still talking to this ?
    Spice is the worm's gonads.
    User avatar
    lotek
     
    Posts: 5734
    Joined: 28 Jul 2009 08:33

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby SandRider » 13 Apr 2012 17:12

    we're waiting for it to say something amusing,
    or delusional, again ....
    ................ I exist only to amuse myself ................
    ImageImage

    I personally feel that this message board, Jacurutu, is full of hateful folks who don't know
    how to fully interact with people.
    ~ "Spice Grandson" (Bryon Merrit) 08 June 2008
    User avatar
    SandRider
    Watermaster
     
    Posts: 6163
    Joined: 05 Oct 2008 16:14
    Location: In the back of your mind. Always.

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby Serkanner » 13 Apr 2012 19:07

    SandRider wrote:we're waiting for it to say something amusing,
    or delusional, again ....


    If I would have stopped shaving after this announcement, I would have a beard long enough to make G. jealous.
    "... the mystery of life isn't a problem to solve but a reality to experience."

    “There is no escape—we pay for the violence of our ancestors.”

    Sandrider: "Keith went to Bobo's for a weekend of drinking, watched some DVDs,
    and wrote a Dune Novel."
    User avatar
    Serkanner
     
    Posts: 2803
    Joined: 17 Feb 2008 18:44
    Location: Den Haag - The Netherlands

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby SandChigger » 14 Apr 2012 06:57

    NotOnasander wrote:Sandchigger, by your logic then, the aquaworms are impotent and will never produce spice. Clearly your wrong, KJA wouldnt of overlooked something that critical.

    Spice Eels.

    Obviously you haven't read the books, have you, fuckwit?
    I have heard of only one mistake that doesn’t have an explanation for a careful reader...with an open mind. (And, no, I’m not going to tell you what it is!) —KJA

    I don't like every writer's style; for instance, I have never been able to get through Ursula LeGuin, China Mieville, or Iain Banks, all of whom are critical darlings. —KJA

    I...had written a bunch of Star Wars and X-Files books...that proved not just that I'm a hack, but that I could write in somebody else's universe... —KJA
    User avatar
    SandChigger
    KJASF Ground Zero
     
    Posts: 14490
    Joined: 08 Feb 2008 22:29
    Location: "Whatcha having, shoog? Hurry up and order now, I ain't got all day!"

    Re: Desertification Discrepancy

    Postby inhuien » 03 Jun 2013 05:44

    ^^^ likes to splamalot :cat fight:
    Image
    User avatar
    inhuien
     
    Posts: 3629
    Joined: 09 Feb 2008 05:03
    Location: right here as in not (all) there

    Previous

    Return to ˲

    Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests