• Register
  • Login
  •          

    Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Image
      Post your own creative writing

    Moderators: Omphalos, Freakzilla, ᴶᵛᵀᴬ

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby lotek » 11 Aug 2011 06:51

    Serkanner wrote:... this is three strikes out. Who are your really?


    https://www.facebook.com/pages/being-a- ... 3406005211 :)
    Spice is the worm's gonads.
    User avatar
    lotek
     
    Posts: 5734
    Joined: 28 Jul 2009 08:33

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby SadisticCynic » 11 Aug 2011 09:54

    Google to the rescue again? :)
    Ah English, the language where pretty much any word can have any meaning! - A Thing of Eternity
    User avatar
    SadisticCynic
     
    Posts: 2002
    Joined: 07 Apr 2009 09:28
    Location: In Time or in Space?

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby lotek » 11 Aug 2011 13:22

    Spice is the worm's gonads.
    User avatar
    lotek
     
    Posts: 5734
    Joined: 28 Jul 2009 08:33

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby Serkanner » 11 Aug 2011 17:26

    lotek wrote:
    Serkanner wrote:... this is three strikes out. Who are your really?


    https://www.facebook.com/pages/being-a- ... 3406005211 :)


    Thanks ... that is spot on.
    "... the mystery of life isn't a problem to solve but a reality to experience."

    “There is no escape—we pay for the violence of our ancestors.”

    Sandrider: "Keith went to Bobo's for a weekend of drinking, watched some DVDs,
    and wrote a Dune Novel."
    User avatar
    Serkanner
     
    Posts: 2803
    Joined: 17 Feb 2008 18:44
    Location: Den Haag - The Netherlands

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby lukecash12 » 11 Aug 2011 22:17

    ... this is three strikes out. Who are your really?


    I don't get what you mean, so my statement probably came out wrong. What I had meant was that the BG breeding program was very similar to the Golden Path, what with it's despotic hold on humanity. Smarter, prettier people, who they bred with other stallions in order to make their KH. If not for Paul they could have had a KH under their thumb, and they would have held the spice over everyone's heads.

    As for the whole "who are you" deal: I have high functioning autism, so just ask for clarity if you want clarity. I'm no troll.
    The sentence below this is false.
    The sentence above this is true.
    lukecash12
     
    Posts: 51
    Joined: 10 Aug 2011 03:40
    Location: Manteca, CA.

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby A Thing of Eternity » 12 Aug 2011 00:04

    Calling it the BG's own Golden Path was a little odd, but I see what you meant - their plan/path for human survival.
    Image
    User avatar
    A Thing of Eternity
     
    Posts: 6090
    Joined: 08 Apr 2008 15:35
    Location: Calgary Alberta

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby SandChigger » 12 Aug 2011 05:43

    Why not just write "the BG plan for human survival" then? :roll: (Not aimed at you, Thang.)
    User avatar
    SandChigger
    KJASF Ground Zero
     
    Posts: 14490
    Joined: 08 Feb 2008 22:29
    Location: "Whatcha having, shoog? Hurry up and order now, I ain't got all day!"

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby Serkanner » 12 Aug 2011 05:55

    lukecash12 wrote: I'm no troll.


    In my book you are, stronthoofd ... I would have answered in Dutch but since it's against forum policy I have to reply in English. Now you can calmly drift of into the Internet scatterings because I don't give a fuck about your autism or your academic stature. You remain a small dicked insulting bastard and I will waste no more time on the likes of you. :greetings-waveyellow:
    "... the mystery of life isn't a problem to solve but a reality to experience."

    “There is no escape—we pay for the violence of our ancestors.”

    Sandrider: "Keith went to Bobo's for a weekend of drinking, watched some DVDs,
    and wrote a Dune Novel."
    User avatar
    Serkanner
     
    Posts: 2803
    Joined: 17 Feb 2008 18:44
    Location: Den Haag - The Netherlands

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby lukecash12 » 13 Aug 2011 01:01

    Serkanner wrote:
    lukecash12 wrote: I'm no troll.


    In my book you are, stronthoofd ... I would have answered in Dutch but since it's against forum policy I have to reply in English. Now you can calmly drift of into the Internet scatterings because I don't give a fuck about your autism or your academic stature. You remain a small dicked insulting bastard and I will waste no more time on the likes of you. :greetings-waveyellow:


    Very impressive. I have a keen interest in Dune, so I think I'll stick around. :violin:
    The sentence below this is false.
    The sentence above this is true.
    lukecash12
     
    Posts: 51
    Joined: 10 Aug 2011 03:40
    Location: Manteca, CA.

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby A Thing of Eternity » 13 Aug 2011 01:18

    Ah, good ol internet drama. :D
    Image
    User avatar
    A Thing of Eternity
     
    Posts: 6090
    Joined: 08 Apr 2008 15:35
    Location: Calgary Alberta

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby reverendmotherQ. » 15 Aug 2011 09:15

    lukecash12 wrote: I can certainly agree with all of you that the BG had a whole bunch of reasons to dislike Leto II, but the fact remains that they were hypocrites. However much of an abomination he was, they would have done the same. Leto II was the perfect expression of their ideology, that he was willing to do anything and outlast anything for the survival and propogation of humanity.


    But unlike the BG, who take several members worth of lives to accomplish their goals, he took it on single handedly and thus their hatred of him stems from the sheer amount of power invested in a single person that such an entity implies. I think in many ways he was the antithesis to the BG because he sought to break the universe from its reoccurring restraints and political crutches that left it doomed to be predictable - which is what the BG hoped to keep alive because humanity's predictability is what made it possible to control them. So your statement seems to over generalize Leto's goals and robs them of any of the newness of meaning that he had in them versus the BG's aims.
    User avatar
    reverendmotherQ.
     
    Posts: 274
    Joined: 05 Feb 2010 15:38
    Location: Cylon Colony

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby SandRider » 15 Aug 2011 17:22

    I'd just like to step in here for a moment & second the
    "do not give a fuck about your (insert 'disability' here)" sentiment ...
    ................ I exist only to amuse myself ................
    ImageImage

    I personally feel that this message board, Jacurutu, is full of hateful folks who don't know
    how to fully interact with people.
    ~ "Spice Grandson" (Bryon Merrit) 08 June 2008
    User avatar
    SandRider
    Watermaster
     
    Posts: 6163
    Joined: 05 Oct 2008 16:14
    Location: In the back of your mind. Always.

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby lukecash12 » 16 Aug 2011 22:23

    But unlike the BG, who take several members worth of lives to accomplish their goals, he took it on single handedly and thus their hatred of him stems from the sheer amount of power invested in a single person that such an entity implies. I think in many ways he was the antithesis to the BG because he sought to break the universe from its reoccurring restraints and political crutches that left it doomed to be predictable - which is what the BG hoped to keep alive because humanity's predictability is what made it possible to control them. So your statement seems to over generalize Leto's goals and robs them of any of the newness of meaning that he had in them versus the BG's aims.


    Well, had the BG had prescience of the caliber that Leto II, you think they would have stood idly by so that humanity could become extinct?
    The sentence below this is false.
    The sentence above this is true.
    lukecash12
     
    Posts: 51
    Joined: 10 Aug 2011 03:40
    Location: Manteca, CA.

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby lukecash12 » 16 Aug 2011 22:25

    SandRider wrote:I'd just like to step in here for a moment & second the
    "do not give a fuck about your (insert 'disability' here)" sentiment ...


    And that's what you look like :arrow: :Adolf:
    The sentence below this is false.
    The sentence above this is true.
    lukecash12
     
    Posts: 51
    Joined: 10 Aug 2011 03:40
    Location: Manteca, CA.

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby Nekhrun » 16 Aug 2011 22:32

    lukecash12 wrote:
    SandRider wrote:I'd just like to step in here for a moment & second the
    "do not give a fuck about your (insert 'disability' here)" sentiment ...


    And that's what you look like :arrow: :Adolf:

    Well, it was only a matter of time before the "Christian" pastor found the Hitler smiley. :roll: Hilarious.
    "If he was here to discuss Dune, he sure as hell picked a dumb way to do it." -Omphalos :character-cookiemonster:

    Happy Memorial Day everyone! -James C. Harwood

    "Three of my videos have over 100 views."
    "Over 500 views for my 'Open Question' video." -Nebiros
    User avatar
    Nekhrun
    Icelandic Wiener
     
    Posts: 3287
    Joined: 10 Feb 2008 16:27

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby A Thing of Eternity » 17 Aug 2011 02:30

    lukecash12 wrote:
    But unlike the BG, who take several members worth of lives to accomplish their goals, he took it on single handedly and thus their hatred of him stems from the sheer amount of power invested in a single person that such an entity implies. I think in many ways he was the antithesis to the BG because he sought to break the universe from its reoccurring restraints and political crutches that left it doomed to be predictable - which is what the BG hoped to keep alive because humanity's predictability is what made it possible to control them. So your statement seems to over generalize Leto's goals and robs them of any of the newness of meaning that he had in them versus the BG's aims.


    Well, had the BG had prescience of the caliber that Leto II, you think they would have stood idly by so that humanity could become extinct?


    No - but could they have figured out the solution?
    Image
    User avatar
    A Thing of Eternity
     
    Posts: 6090
    Joined: 08 Apr 2008 15:35
    Location: Calgary Alberta

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby inhuien » 17 Aug 2011 05:04

    lukecash12 wrote:
    But unlike the BG, who take several members worth of lives to accomplish their goals, he took it on single handedly and thus their hatred of him stems from the sheer amount of power invested in a single person that such an entity implies. I think in many ways he was the antithesis to the BG because he sought to break the universe from its reoccurring restraints and political crutches that left it doomed to be predictable - which is what the BG hoped to keep alive because humanity's predictability is what made it possible to control them. So your statement seems to over generalize Leto's goals and robs them of any of the newness of meaning that he had in them versus the BG's aims.


    Well, had the BG had prescience of the caliber that Leto II, you think they would have stood idly by so that humanity could become extinct?


    Leto II wrote

    "WHY DID YOUR SISTERHOOD NOT BUILD THE GOLDEN PATH? YOU KNEW THE NECESSITY.
    YOUR FAILURE CONDEMNED ME, THE GOD EMPEROR, TO MILLENNIA OF PERSONAL DESPAIR."
    Image
    User avatar
    inhuien
     
    Posts: 3629
    Joined: 09 Feb 2008 05:03
    Location: right here as in not (all) there

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby lotek » 17 Aug 2011 07:20

    A Thing of Eternity wrote:
    lukecash12 wrote:
    But unlike the BG, who take several members worth of lives to accomplish their goals, he took it on single handedly and thus their hatred of him stems from the sheer amount of power invested in a single person that such an entity implies. I think in many ways he was the antithesis to the BG because he sought to break the universe from its reoccurring restraints and political crutches that left it doomed to be predictable - which is what the BG hoped to keep alive because humanity's predictability is what made it possible to control them. So your statement seems to over generalize Leto's goals and robs them of any of the newness of meaning that he had in them versus the BG's aims.


    Well, had the BG had prescience of the caliber that Leto II, you think they would have stood idly by so that humanity could become extinct?


    No - but could they have figured out the solution?


    as long as it's not too final...
    lukecash12 wrote:
    SandRider wrote:I'd just like to step in here for a moment & second the
    "do not give a fuck about your (insert 'disability' here)" sentiment ...


    And that's what you look like :arrow: :Adolf:


    inhuien wrote:"WHY DID YOUR SISTERHOOD NOT BUILD THE GOLDEN PATH? YOU KNEW THE NECESSITY.
    YOUR FAILURE CONDEMNED ME, THE GOD EMPEROR, TO MILLENNIA OF PERSONAL DESPAIR."


    Nice !
    Spice is the worm's gonads.
    User avatar
    lotek
     
    Posts: 5734
    Joined: 28 Jul 2009 08:33

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby inhuien » 17 Aug 2011 08:11

    lotek wrote:
    inhuien wrote:"WHY DID YOUR SISTERHOOD NOT BUILD THE GOLDEN PATH? YOU KNEW THE NECESSITY.
    YOUR FAILURE CONDEMNED ME, THE GOD EMPEROR, TO MILLENNIA OF PERSONAL DESPAIR."


    Nice !

    Even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day. :)
    Image
    User avatar
    inhuien
     
    Posts: 3629
    Joined: 09 Feb 2008 05:03
    Location: right here as in not (all) there

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby lukecash12 » 17 Aug 2011 23:48

    inhuien wrote:
    lukecash12 wrote:
    But unlike the BG, who take several members worth of lives to accomplish their goals, he took it on single handedly and thus their hatred of him stems from the sheer amount of power invested in a single person that such an entity implies. I think in many ways he was the antithesis to the BG because he sought to break the universe from its reoccurring restraints and political crutches that left it doomed to be predictable - which is what the BG hoped to keep alive because humanity's predictability is what made it possible to control them. So your statement seems to over generalize Leto's goals and robs them of any of the newness of meaning that he had in them versus the BG's aims.


    Well, had the BG had prescience of the caliber that Leto II, you think they would have stood idly by so that humanity could become extinct?


    Leto II wrote

    "WHY DID YOUR SISTERHOOD NOT BUILD THE GOLDEN PATH? YOU KNEW THE NECESSITY.
    YOUR FAILURE CONDEMNED ME, THE GOD EMPEROR, TO MILLENNIA OF PERSONAL DESPAIR."


    I wouldn't be so hasty to draw a line like that. The BG didn't appear to recognize Kralizec at all throughout the series. Their primary concern was to eventually get humanity under their thumb and breed perfection. But I don't mean that in a despotic sense, having "humanity under their thumb", I mean that they wanted control the BG way.
    The sentence below this is false.
    The sentence above this is true.
    lukecash12
     
    Posts: 51
    Joined: 10 Aug 2011 03:40
    Location: Manteca, CA.

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby A Thing of Eternity » 18 Aug 2011 02:28

    Freakzilla didn't draw the line, Leto II did. :wink:

    I think that's the thing though, while I don't necessarily think the BG understood the need for the Golden Path, or even really what it was, Leto II meant something by that message - either he believed that they knew they should have caused the Scattering, or something like it, or he meant that he believed they should have known (or did know subconsciously)that their own plans would not succeed and they should have thought more long term.

    I'm loath to debate with Leto II.
    Image
    User avatar
    A Thing of Eternity
     
    Posts: 6090
    Joined: 08 Apr 2008 15:35
    Location: Calgary Alberta

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby lukecash12 » 18 Aug 2011 19:39

    A Thing of Eternity wrote:Freakzilla didn't draw the line, Leto II did. :wink:

    I think that's the thing though, while I don't necessarily think the BG understood the need for the Golden Path, or even really what it was, Leto II meant something by that message - either he believed that they knew they should have caused the Scattering, or something like it, or he meant that he believed they should have known (or did know subconsciously)that their own plans would not succeed and they should have thought more long term.

    I'm loath to debate with Leto II.


    I'm more in favor of the second position you just submitted.
    The sentence below this is false.
    The sentence above this is true.
    lukecash12
     
    Posts: 51
    Joined: 10 Aug 2011 03:40
    Location: Manteca, CA.

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby Freakzilla » 18 Aug 2011 19:53

    Well, you know, this was the reason the were breeding for the KH, so he could see the big picture that they could only see less than half of.
    Image
    Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
    ~Pink Snowman
    User avatar
    Freakzilla
    Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
     
    Posts: 18057
    Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
    Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby A Thing of Eternity » 18 Aug 2011 19:57

    Freakzilla wrote:Well, you know, this was the reason the were breeding for the KH, so he could see the big picture that they could only see less than half of.


    Why "less than half" rather than just half? I'm under the impression the BG did not know they were going to get a prescient out of the KH.
    Image
    User avatar
    A Thing of Eternity
     
    Posts: 6090
    Joined: 08 Apr 2008 15:35
    Location: Calgary Alberta

    Re: Did the BG have a justifiable position against prescience?

    Postby Freakzilla » 18 Aug 2011 20:57

    A Thing of Eternity wrote:
    Freakzilla wrote:Well, you know, this was the reason the were breeding for the KH, so he could see the big picture that they could only see less than half of.


    Why "less than half" rather than just half? I'm under the impression the BG did not know they were going to get a prescient out of the KH.


    Appendix III: Report on Bene Gesserit Motives and Purposes

    The Bene Gesserit program had as its target the breeding of a person they
    labeled "Kwisatz Haderach," a term signifying "one who can be many places at
    once." In simpler terms, what they sought was a human with mental powers
    permitting him to understand and use higher order dimensions.
    They were breeding for a super-Mentat, a human computer with some of the
    prescient abilities found in Guild navigators. Now, attend these facts
    carefully:
    Image
    Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
    ~Pink Snowman
    User avatar
    Freakzilla
    Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
     
    Posts: 18057
    Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
    Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA

    PreviousNext

    Return to ˲

    Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

    cron