HERESY ?

    Can't find the appropriate forum for your topic? Post it here!

Moderators: Omphalos, Freakzilla, ᴶᵛᵀᴬ

User avatar
Freakzilla
Lead Singer and Driver of the Winnebego
Posts: 18257
Joined: 05 Feb 2008 01:27
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Contact:

Postby Freakzilla » 08 Oct 2008 16:19

SandChigger wrote:
Tleszer wrote:All hail the Normacle, for she will save us from the terrible machines!

iPods? :?


Cell Phones
Image
Paul of Dune was so bad it gave me a seizure that dislocated both of my shoulders and prolapsed my anus.
~Pink Snowman

User avatar
Tleszer
Posts: 2161
Joined: 17 Feb 2008 18:02

Postby Tleszer » 08 Oct 2008 16:49

iPhone - the precursor of Omnius
DUNE, as interpreted by a blue man with a green tushie

User avatar
Drunken Idaho
Posts: 1197
Joined: 15 Sep 2008 23:56
Location: Ontario, Canada

Postby Drunken Idaho » 09 Oct 2008 09:57

Tleszer wrote:iPhone - the precursor of Omnius


Nope. This guy:

Image

halcyo
Posts: 107
Joined: 13 Feb 2008 16:08

Postby halcyo » 11 Oct 2008 12:12

I will admit one thing: I always feel a TINY bit silly when I have to explain to people that there are SIX books. I don't know why, but people seem to immediately assume that six is just too damn much to truly be a coherent masterpiece. Most people think that anything that is truly grand has to be a trilogy - call it conditioning if you will, but that seems to be the assumption most people make at first glance.

However I REFUSE to believe that Frank did not intend for Heretics and Chapterhouse to be a second trilogy, and a MAJOR finale for the entire chronicles. My gut reasoning for this is that if he were interested in 'cashing in' on the earlier novels, why would he set the later ones in such a distant time and setting? Why wouldn't he find a way to involve all the earlier characters, or write prequels and 'in between' books for the original series? To me, the themes and characters are FAR from the 'obvious' elements most writers would have used if CASHING IN on a franchise. Heretics and Chapterhouse are written with far too much care and love, just like the earlier works, to be dismissed as inconsequential.

I find this an interesting parallel to other art forms. Take music for example - why is it that people always seem to gravitate toward praising only the first or early works of an artist as his/her/their best? I think alot of people don't have the patience to see a work of art grow and evolve. We tend to like short, easy pieces I guess. Humans LOVE closure, and unfortunately Frank has HAUNTED us with the lack thereof...