SandRider wrote:Texas will take the square states, & the central Canadian Provinces mentioned;
(also the Arizona Territory & Mexico)
Canada can have Washington, Western Oregon, and Northern California,
as well as the "pile of small states" in the northeast, to include New York
and Pennsylvania, and any other state that considers itself "New England";
Southern California, west of the Mojave, can declare itself a sovereign
People's Republic of Hedonism, and a sanctuary-city, exempt from
international law and protected by a special UN Treaty;
Utah may absorb Nevada, southeastern California, Montana, Idaho,
Colorado, and Eastern Oregon and the deserts of Eastern Washington,
to establish the New Mormon Empire, as foretold in the Book of Mormon
and Joseph Smith's I Like Grapes & Women ...
The remaining 10 states of the Old Confederacy, and Missouri and Kentucky,
and Maryland and Delaware, may build a wall around themselves and toss out
whoever they don't like; the southern portion of the state of Florida is ceded to Israel;
question:
does Canada desire to split itself into a western and eastern nation,
as not only will this nation be divided by culture, it will now have Texas
right down the middle of its backside ?
The US Federal District of Columbia is to be returned to Maryland, and Arlington
to the Custis-Lee family; the Indian Exclusion Act of 1859, passed by the
Texas Legislature, shall also be repealed and provision shall be made for the
return of any tribe that wishes to their ancestral homelands, as protectorates
of the Republic of Texas;
who'd I leave out ?
I think you left out Alaska and Hawaii. We'd love to put Hawaii in with BC, but understand if they'd rather go it alone. Alaska... we don't want it. All the resources aren't even close to enough to pay for Palin having to be called Canadian.
Other than that, this sounds like a good deal to me. As to the underlined, we won't be split, we'll just look like a big frowny face on a map (remember we still have the 3 northern territories uniting our east and west). As to having Texas right down our middle... we already have that in all but name!
What would actually split us would be if Quebec left. If that happened then it's almost certain that the NFL (not the football league...) seperatists would make a go of it as well, possibly conquoring the other maritime provinces, it wouldn't be good. As such I think we'll have to hanng onto Quebec.
Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't want him governing me either, but it'd be pretty funny to see him in charge of someone else's country!
BAHUMBUG! We get all the good states, not those darned middle ones! You keep Montana, we want the entire west coast, but are willing to negotiate on California as long as we get Oregon and Washington. Personally I think we should also get all those northern states on the east coast, don't know the names because there's a pile of tiny states there, but the ones with the maple syrup... those really should have a matching flag I think!
